Task-2 :Governments payment to unemployed

[A.Salama]

It is my first writing trial, Your comments and guidance will be highly appreciated

In some countries, people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit. While some support this, other people believe that this money should not be given.
Discuss both points of view and give your own point of view.
Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After the economic crisis that hit the global economics all over the world in 2007, millions of people lost their jobs. Some governments pay a weekly amount for unemployed citizens, some people support the governments rule to ensure minimum income for unemployed, some others believe that money should not be paid to them. This essay will discuss the tow point of views.
Groups of economists have the believe that governments have an extended responsibilities towards all citizen , particularly, the unemployed ones , as money paid by governments help them to fulfill their daily needs, and ensure the minimum level of respected human lifestyle. For instance in some Europe countries, in particular , France and Germany, the unemployed are entitled to monthly payment, medical insurance and education assistance. Such type of treat could raise the feeling of loyalty towards the country and make citizen ready to do all the best to give country the future and prosperity.
On the other hand, groups of economists and social scientists are against the benefits that paid to unemployed without doing any job. They recommend authorities to encourage the unemployed to seek for job, start private business or join community activities as a source for gain, otherwise they would like to gain effortless money, in this case they would not feel the value of money and may waste it in unbeneficial ways; drugs, weapons and poker are common ways to do so.
As the idea of governments payment to unemployed, has supports and opposers , and after hashing out the pros and cons of tow opinions we came out to the fact that government payment to unemployed should has some regulations, for example the unemployed should prove that he or she is seeking for job, self developing to meet work market requirements by attending courses or doing positive community activities .

[Flick]

In some countries, people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit. While some support this, other people believe that this money should not be given.
Discuss both points of view and give your own point of view.
Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After the economic crisis that hit global economics all over the world in 2007, millions of people lost their jobs. Some governments pay a weekly amount to unemployed citizens. Some people support the governments rule to ensure minimum income for the unemployed, while others believe that money should not be paid to them. This essay will discuss the two points of view.

Groups of economists believe that governments have a responsibility towards all citizens, particularly the unemployed ones, as money paid by governments helps them to fulfill their daily needs, and ensure the minimum level of respected human lifestyle. For instance, in some Europe countries, in particular France and Germany, the unemployed are entitled to a monthly payment, medical insurance and education assistance. Such financial aid raises the feeling of loyalty towards the country and make citizens willing to give their best to their country to secure its future and prosperity.
On the other hand, another group of economists and social scientists are against the benefits that are paid to unemployed people without anything in return. They recommend authorities to encourage the unemployed to seek work, start a private business or join community activities as a source for gain, otherwise they will not feel the value of money and may waste it in nonbeneficial ways; drugs, weapons and gambling are common ways to do so.

The idea of government payments to unemployed citizens has support and opposition. After reviewing the pros and cons of these opinions, it is clear that government payments to unemployed people should have some regulations. For example, the unemployed should prove that he or she is seeking work, self developing to meet job market requirements by attending courses or doing positive community activities .

[A.Salama]

Flick,
Thanks for your reply; really it helped me a lot .